Funding the Arts

We’ll start doing some reading in a few weeks that addresses some of the complexity in the United States with regards to arts funding, but can’t hurt to begin to draw your attention now to the big issues.

Historically, in the U.S., the burden of arts funding has been split between audience members at the gate and charitable giving…with government subsidies picking up the slack. There is a more vigorous tradition in Canada, Europe, Australia and elsewhere of of larger government funding, although that is currently under real pressure because of the economy.

The issue is not simply one of conservative/liberal splits around the question of “big government.” Many folks, across the political spectrum, have embraced our tradition of doing things because of the autonomy it has seemingly granted artists and institutions.

But in a poor economy, private giving dries up quickly. . . and, as we saw the other day, with arts participation down, institutions can’t rely on the gate for basic operating budget.

So the scenarios below are very common:

Colorado Symphony crisis

Philadelphia Symphony crisis

Keep in mind that these are not small, marginal operations: We’re talking about major cultural organizations who employ hundreds, and, in the case of the Philadelphia, you’re talking a hundreds year old center of artistic practice.

Advertisements

About jchall1960

I'm the instructor for FA 200, Introduction to the Arts at the University of Alabama
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s